
Justices want solicitor general to weigh in on Medicare ‘upcoding’ ruling
Table of Contents
A image illustration shows a basic practitioner holding a stethoscope. REUTERS/Regis Duvignau
Sign up now for Absolutely free limitless access to Reuters.com
(Reuters) – The U.S. Supreme Courtroom on Monday signaled continued desire in a whistleblower suit involving allegations of systemic exaggeration of Medicare patients’ ailments, inquiring Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar to weigh in on the amount of detail demanded to plead fraud “with particularity” beneath the False Statements Act.
Tejinder Singh of the Sparacino firm, representing high-quality-assurance nurse Cathy Owsley, urged the large court docket to critique an Oct ruling of the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to resolve a break up amongst the circuits about no matter if the legislation requires plaintiffs to present information about unique circumstances of overbilling.
The justices in January questioned for the solicitor general’s sights on a comparable petition submitted by Singh in a different whistleblower scenario, Johnson v. Bethany Hospice, but Prelogar has not but responded.
Sign-up now for Absolutely free unrestricted access to Reuters.com
In each instances, Singh argues that seven circuits consider a versatile tactic, though 5 other individuals require bigger concentrations of detail or actual examples of padded invoices.
In Owsley’s case, the 6th Circuit acknowledged that she had offered “considerable detail” about upcoding methods by her employer, Envisions Health care subsidiary Treatment Link of Cincinnati, and a third-social gathering coding contractor, Fazzi Associates. However, the courtroom said she experienced not presented ample data about particular invoices “she thinks were fraudulent” — and “for that cause alone,” it affirmed the dismissal of her lawsuit.
Singh and the attorneys for the corporations in Owsley’s complaint did not promptly answer to requests for comment.
The situation is United States ex rel Owsley v. Care Link of Cincinnati LLC, United States Supreme Court docket, No. 21-936.
For Owsley: Tejinder Singh of Sparacino
For Treatment Connection: Stuart Gerson of Epstein Becker & Eco-friendly
For Fazzi Associates: Douglas Hallward-Driemeier of Ropes & Gray
Examine additional:
SCOTUS asks prime lawyer: How substantially detail wanted to plead bogus claims?
Sign up now for No cost unlimited accessibility to Reuters.com
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Rely on Ideas.